Page 1 of 1

War on Easter

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:44 pm
by Dardedar
DAR
The Comedy Central show, The Colbert Report did a hilarious bit last week on the up coming "War on Easter" a spoof of the ridiculous "War on Christmas" stir up by O'Lielly.

Turns out the comedians can't even write their satire ridiculous or mocking enough to stay ahead of the standard news concocted at FOX.

Image

Transcript:

Meacham: The secular battle against Christmas, against Easter, against those kinds of things that you're talking about-against "Under God" in the pledge..

O'Reilly: You don't deny that battle is taking place?

Meacham: No...
***

So we have the overt Comedy Channel, and then we have FOX news which can be just as funny except for the fact that about 1/3 of the nation takes FOX seriously, and that isn't funny. It's dangerous.

D.

Let's not forget this reward

Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:48 pm
by Dardedar
$2,000 REWARD!

Tell us exactly what happened at the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ and win $1,000! Read:

* Matthew 28
* Mark 16
* Luke 24
* John 20 & 21
* Acts 1:3-12
* 1 Corinthians 15:3-8

Then, without omitting a single detail from the accounts, write one consistent narrative - with scriptural citations - of the events from the Resurrection to the Ascension of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Please tell us where you saw this reward offer and mail your claim for $1,000 REWARD to:

RESURRECTION REWARD
PO Box 3127
Moscow ID 83843-1906

***
http://fayfreethinkers.com/bibleeducati ... acts.shtml

The Fayetteville Freethinkers will match that $1,000 so prize money totals $2,000.

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:44 am
by Barbara Fitzpatrick
I wouldn't count John in there. He was obviously very jealous of the Big J's relationship with anybody else, especially Judas (that's where all the serious Judas=betrayer comes from) and Mary Magdalene (the other stories have Mary actually seeing Jesus, while John just has her reporting his body missing). I mean, come on, John referred to himself as "the disciple Jesus loved" - if that isn't if that's not possessiveness to the point of obsession, I don't know what is.

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:55 am
by Dardedar
Barbara Fitzpatrick wrote:I wouldn't count John in there.
DAR
You have to. "John" tells his version of the story in chapters 20-21, and to win the prize, you have to make all of the pieces fit, or at least show that they do not contradict other pieces. If the Bible were truly inerrant, the stories would be at least consistent and the verses could be put together in a timeline that doesn't contradict itself.

Our money is safe.

D.