Page 4 of 4

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:19 pm
by Dardedar
Very nice collection of useful charts on the economy here:

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center ... alecon.pdf

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:00 pm
by Dardedar
Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:40 pm
by Dardedar
Image
.
.
Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:32 am
by Dardedar
13 Reasons To Be Glad Bush Is No Longer President

Think Progress

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:12 pm
by Dardedar
Image
.
.
Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:57 pm
by Dardedar
Conservatives, still idiots. Who knew?

Political ideology can dominate other factors in choosing energy efficiency

"Energy efficiency sounds like a good idea on multiple fronts; mitigating global warming, reducing dependence on foreign oil and saving money. Conservatives and liberals may disagree about the first reason, but you would expect both of them to enthusiastically embrace energy efficiency based on the other two reasons. Yet we find attitudes toward energy efficiency split along politically ideological lines in this country. Why? A new study suggests one simple potential reason: the liberal environmental messaging associated with energy efficiency may discourage conservatives from using such technologies.

That is the conclusion of a study done by researchers from Duke University and the University of Pennsylvania which was published last week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences."

Scientific American

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 9:20 pm
by Dardedar
Image

False pretenses
Following 9/11, President Bush and seven top officials of his administration waged a
carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about Saddam Hussein's Iraq


President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nearly five years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.

On at least 532 separate occasions (in speeches, briefings, interviews, testimony, and the like), Bush and these three key officials, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, stated unequivocally that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (or was trying to produce or obtain them), links to Al Qaeda, or both. This concerted effort was the underpinning of the Bush administration's case for war.

It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to Al Qaeda. This was the conclusion of numerous bipartisan government investigations, including those by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2004 and 2006), the 9/11 Commission, and the multinational Iraq Survey Group, whose "Duelfer Report" established that Saddam Hussein had terminated Iraq's nuclear program in 1991 and made little effort to restart it.

In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003. Not surprisingly, the officials with the most opportunities to make speeches, grant media interviews, and otherwise frame the public debate also made the most false statements, according to this first-ever analysis of the entire body of prewar rhetoric.

President Bush, for example, made 232 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and another 28 false statements about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Secretary of State Powell had the second-highest total in the two-year period, with 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda. Rumsfeld and Fleischer each made 109 false statements, followed by Wolfowitz (with 85), Rice (with 56), Cheney (with 48), and McClellan (with 14)."

The rest... http://www.publicintegrity.org/2008/01/ ... -pretenses

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 4:15 pm
by Dardedar
Image

Reference:

Bloomberg

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 7:52 pm
by Dardedar
Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:06 pm
by Dardedar

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:29 pm
by Dardedar
Reagan’s Labor Secretary Admits ‘Trickle-Down’ Failed, Led to Inequality (Video)

"Barry Bluestone [regarding] “The Gipper’s” trickle-down economics regarding socioeconomic inequality.

He explains why, for the 4 million long-term unemployed, things are not looking any rosier. Inequality for those at the bottom persists, and as he explains, it is linked to high unemployment.

Destroying the basic tenets of top-down trickle-down Reaganomics, he said, “The wealthiest people spend maybe 30% of their income. Poor people spend 100%, working people spend 98%, so as we move money away from working families towards very wealthy families, we take more and more consumption out of the economy, means slower and slower growth, means higher and higher an extended unemployment.”

http://www.occupydemocrats.com/the-one- ... nequality/

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:31 am
by Dardedar
"Historical data shows that INCOME GROWTH for ALL ECONOMIC CLASSES do better under DEMOCRATS. Whether it’s a Democratic controlled Senate, House, both, President or all three, ALL classes do better when Democrats are in control than when Republicans are in control.

The U.S. economy has grown at an average real rate of 4.35 percent under Democratic presidents and just 2.54 percent under Republicans. The data was obtained from census.gov "
http://i.imgur.com/Tt8qs.png

Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:57 pm
by Dardedar
"The recovery from the Great Recession has been accompanied by the slowest growth of public spending following any recession since World War II. If the current recovery had instead featured public spending growth that mirrored spending growth following the early 1980s recession (one that was similarly as deep, if not as long, as the Great Recession), the economy would be almost fully recovered with more than 7 million additional jobs."

Image

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/2 ... 86391.html

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 4:19 pm
by Dardedar
Image

"The Federal Budget -- Red Ink
A look at the federal budget over the same time frame reveals a starkly different picture -- many years of deficits, with only a few years of surplus -- a surplus that disappeared during the G.W. Bush Administration. In 1993, a Democratic Congress and President Clinton, without a single Republican vote in either the House or Senate, enacted a budget plan that put it on a path to elimination of the deficits --and brought the budget into balance, and then later into surplus. In his 1999 State of the Union address, with the budget then in balance, Clinton called for the Social Security surplus investments to be held in a special reserve and not used for other government spending."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-don-r ... 45106.html

Image

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:25 pm
by Dardedar
Wish there was a way to make this chart smaller:
Image

“The U.S. economy not only grows faster, according to real GDP and other measures, during Democratic versus Republican presidencies, it also produces more jobs, lowers the unemployment rate, generates higher corporate profits and investment, and turns in higher stock market returns. Indeed, it outperforms under almost all standard macroeconomic metrics.”
http://fortune.com/2014/07/29/economic- ... residents/

Citing this paper from the the National Bureau of Economic Research:
http://www.nber.org/papers/w20324

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:16 am
by Savonarola
Dardedar wrote:Wish there was a way to make this chart smaller:
We can resize him. We have the technology.
econ-growth-by-party.jpg

Re: The Republican Record

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:46 pm
by Dardedar
Image